Skip to main content
Log in

The social context for harvestingIriartea deltoidea (Arecaceae)

  • Published:
Economic Botany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Iriartea deltoidea grows abundantly from Nicaragua to Bolivia. The stem is harvested for construction, furniture making, and handicrafts. The objective of my study was to understand the potential for sustainable harvesting of this palm. Ethnographic fieldwork about market patterns and decision-making among harvesters revealed the nature of harvesting pressures near settled areas. The study also demonstrates methods for assessing social and economic influences on harvesting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Alcorn, J. B. 1990. Indigenous agroforestry strategies meeting farmers’ needs. Pages 141–151 in A. B. Anderson, ed., Alternatives to deforestation. Columbia University Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1991. Ethics, economies, and conservation. Pages 317–349 in M. L. Oldfield and J. B. Alcorn, eds., Biodiversity: Culture, conservation and ecodevelopment. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, P. J. 1998a. Demography, conservation, and stem harvesting of the palm,Iriartea deltoidea. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1998b. Using ecological and economic information to determine sustainable harvest levels of a plant population. Pages 137–155 in E. Wollenberg and A. Ingles, eds., Incomes from the forest: Methods for the development and conservation of forest products for local communities. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, andF.E. Putz. (2002) Harvesting and conservation: Are both possible for the palm,Iriartea deltoidea? Forest Ecology and Management 170: 271–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, H.R. 1994. Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches, 2nd edition. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaikie, P., andH. Brookfield. 1987. Defining and debating the problem. In P. Blaikie and H. Brookfield, eds., Land degradation and society. Methuen, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clay, J. 1992. Some general principles and strategies for developing markets in North America and Europe for non-timber forest products. Advances in Economic Botany 9:101–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, A.B. 2001. Applied ethnobotany: People, wild plant use and conservation. Earthscan Publications Ltd., London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodson, C.H., andA. H. Gentry. 1990. Biological extinction in western Ecuador. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 78:273–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dove, M.R. 1993a. A revisionist view of tropical deforestation and development. Environmental Conservation 20:17–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1993b. Small holder rubber and swidden agriculture in Borneo: A sustainable adaptation to the ecology and economy of the tropical forest. Economic Botany 47:136–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ervin, J.B., andP. Mallet. 2002. The rise of certification, the current state of the playing field for NTFP certification programmes and future prospects. Pages 7–19 in P. Shanley, A. R. Pierce, S. A. Laird, and A. Guillen, eds., Tapping the green market: Certification and management of non-tim-ber forest products. Earthscan Publications Ltd., London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. 1983. Local knowledge. Basic Books, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecht, S.B. 1993. The logic of livestock and deforestation in Amazonia. BioScience 43:687–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, A. 1990. Arecaceae. Part I. Introduction and the Iriarteinae. Flora neotropica. Monograph 53. New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. 2002. Palm heart. Pages 75–84 in P. Shanley, A. R. Pierce, S. A. Laird, and A. Guillen, eds., Tapping the green market: Certification and management of non-timber forest products. Earthscan Publications Ltd., London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyal, E. 1996. The palm has its time: An ethnoecology ofSabal uresana in Sonora, Mexico. Economic Botany 50:446–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, N. 1992. The primary source: Tropical forests and our future updated for the 1990s. Norton, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair, P.K.R. 1983. Agroforestry with coconuts and other tropical plantation crops. Pages 70–102 in P. A. Huxley, ed., Plant research and agroforestry. International Center for Research in Agroforestry, Nairobi, Kenya.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nations, J.D. 1992. Xateros, chicleros, and pimenteros: Harvesting renewable tropical forest resources in the Guatemalan Petén. Pages 208–219 in K. Redford and C. Padoch, eds., Conservation of neotropical forests. Columbia University Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neill, D.,W. Palacios,C. Ceron, andL. Mejia. 1993. Composition and structure of a tropical wet forest in Amazonian Ecuador: Diversity and edaphic differentiation. Presentation at 1993 Meeting of the Association for Tropical Biology. San Juan, Puerto Rico.

  • Neumann, R. P., andE. Hirsch. 2000. Commerci-alisation of non-timber forest products: Review and analysis of research. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okafor, J. C. 1999. The use of fanner knowledge in non-wood forest product research. Pages 123–132 in T. C. H. Sunderland, L. E. Clark, and P. Vantomme, eds., Non-wood forest products of Central Africa: Current research issues and prospects for conservation and development. FAO, Rome, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padoch, C. 1992. Marketing of non-timber forest products in western Amazonia. Advances in Economic Botany 9:43–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D. 1994. Deforesting the Amazon: towards an economic solution. Pages 80–101 in J. Weiss, ed., The economics of project appraisal and the environment. Edward Elgar, Hants, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck, R. 1990. Promoting agroforestry practices among small producers: The case of the Coca agroforestry project in Amazonian Ecuador. Pages 167–180 in A. B. Anderson, ed., Alternatives to deforestation. Columbia University Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, H. B., and H. Balslev. 1992. The economic botany of Ecuadorian palms. Pages 173–191 in M. Plotkin and L. Famolare, eds. Sustainable harvest and marketing of rain forest products. Conservation International, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peres, C. A., C. Baider, P. A. Zuidema, L. H. O. Wadt, K. A. Kainer, D. A. P. Gomes-Silva, R. P. Salomão, L. L. Simões, E. R. N. Franciosi, F. C. Valverde, R. Gribel, G. H. Shepard, Jr.,M. Kanashiro, P. Coventry, D. W. Yu, A. R. Watkinson, andR. P. Freckleton. 2003. Demographic threats to the sustainability of Brazil nut exploitation. Science 302:2112–2114.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, C. M. 1991. Plant demography and the management of tropical forest resources: A case study ofBrosimum alicastrum in Mexico. Pages 265–272 in A. Gomez-Pompa, T. C. Whitmore, and M. Hadley, eds., Rain forest regeneration and management. UNESCO and the Parthenon Publishing Group, Paris, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudel, T., andB. Horowitz. 1993. Tropical deforestation: Small farmers and land clearing in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Columbia University Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmink, M. 1994. The socioeconomic matrix of deforestation. Pages 253–275 in L. Arizpe, M. R Stone, and D. C. Major, eds., Population and environment: Rethinking the debate. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, A. 1962. Collected papers I: The problem of social reality. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanley, P., andS. A. Laird. 2002. The process of drafting and revising guidelines for NTFP certification. Pages 20–27 in P. Shanley, A. R. Pierce, S. A. Laird, and A. Guillen, eds., Tapping the green market: Certification and management of non-tim-ber forest products. Earthscan Publications Ltd., London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrupp, L. A. 1989. Legitimizing local knowledge: From displacement to empowerment for third world people. Agriculture and Human Values 4:13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toman, M. 1992. The difficulty in defining sustainability. Resources 106:3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, S. 1987. The unspeakable: Discourse, dialogue, and rhetoric in the postmodern world. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uquillas, J. 1984. Colonization and spontaneous settlement in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Pages 261–284 in M. Schmink and C. Wood, eds., Frontier expansion in Amazonia. University of Florida Press, Gainesville, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vayda, A.P. 1983. Progressive contextualization: Methods for research in human ecology. Human Ecology 11:265–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viana, V. M. J. Ervin, R. Z. Donovan, C. Elliott, andH. Gholz. 1996. Certification of forest products: Issues and perspectives. Island Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, W. 1984. Indian policy in Amazonian Ecuador. Pages 8–32 in M. Schmink and C. Wood, eds., Frontier expansion in Amazonia. University of Florida Press, Gainesville, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunder, S. 2000. The economics of deforestation: The example of Ecuador. Palgrave Macmillan, Hampshire, UK.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patti J. Anderson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anderson, P.J. The social context for harvestingIriartea deltoidea (Arecaceae). Econ Bot 58, 410–419 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1663/0013-0001(2004)058[0410:TSCFHI]2.0.CO;2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1663/0013-0001(2004)058[0410:TSCFHI]2.0.CO;2

Key Words

Navigation